Evaluating the Findings of the IMPACT-C Randomized Clinical Trial to Improve COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage in Skilled Nursing Facilities.

IMPORTANCE: Identifying successful strategies to increase COVID-19 vaccination among skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents and staff is integral to preventing future outbreaks in a continually overwhelmed system. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a multicomponent vaccine campaign would increase vaccine rates among SNF residents and staff. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a cluster randomized trial with a rapid timeline (December 2020-March 2021) coinciding with the Pharmacy Partnership Program (PPP). It included 133 SNFs in 4 health care systems across 16 states: 63 and 70 facilities in the intervention and control arms, respectively, and participants included 7496 long-stay residents (>100 days) and 17 963 staff. INTERVENTIONS: Multicomponent interventions were introduced at the facility level that included: (1) educational material and electronic messaging for staff; (2) town hall meetings with frontline staff (nurses, nurse aides, dietary, housekeeping); (3) messaging from community leaders; (4) gifts (eg, T-shirts) with socially concerned messaging; (5) use of a specialist to facilitate consent with residents' proxies; and (6) funds for additional COVID-19 testing of staff/residents. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes of this study were the proportion of residents (from electronic medical records) and staff (from facility logs) who received a COVID-19 vaccine (any), examined as 2 separate outcomes. Mixed-effects generalized linear models with a binomial distribution were used to compare outcomes between arms, using intent-to-treat approach. Race was examined as an effect modifier in the resident outcome model. RESULTS: Most facilities were for-profit (95; 71.4%), and 1973 (26.3%) of residents were Black. Among residents, 82.5% (95% CI, 81.2%-83.7%) were vaccinated in the intervention arm, compared with 79.8% (95% CI, 78.5%-81.0%) in the usual care arm (marginal difference 0.8%; 95% CI, -1.9% to 3.7%). Among staff, 49.5% (95% CI, 48.4%-50.6%) were vaccinated in the intervention arm, compared with 47.9% (95% CI, 46.9%-48.9%) in usual care arm (marginal difference: -0.4%; 95% CI, -4.2% to 3.1%). There was no association of race with the outcome among residents. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A multicomponent vaccine campaign did not have a significant effect on vaccination rates among SNF residents or staff. Among residents, vaccination rates were high. However, half the staff remained unvaccinated despite these efforts. Vaccination campaigns to target SNF staff will likely need to use additional approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04732819.

Challenges with Conducting an Investigational Drug Study in Older Adults in Nursing Homes During a Pandemic

In the early months of the pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 infected nursing home residents in explosive and deadly outbreaks. Nursing home residents disproportionately accounted for over 40% of COVID-19 mortality nationally. This national emergency drove scientific and public health experts to develop and implement administrative, clinical, and research programs to limit the pandemic’s impact, especially for high-risk individuals, such as those hospitalized or living in nursing homes. Nursing home policies, prompted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, severely restricted access beginning in March 2020 in an effort to limit disease exposure. In July 2020 we began the process to conduct an investigational SARS-CoV-2 post exposure prophylaxis study of nursing home residents, incorporating FDA guidance developed for conducting investigational drug trials in the context of COVID-19. Our research teams adapted our nursing home engagement, resident consenting and research data collection strategies accordingly. We remotely screened residents living in any of 28 nursing homes for eligibility to participate, ultimately consenting and randomizing individuals in 11 facilities. Of the 2,683 nursing home residents 65 years or older we screened, 48 (1.8%) agreed to consent individually or through proxy, most often a legally authorized representative. We will describe our research methods, with emphasis on how we addressed challenges presented due to performing all research tasks remotely and identify strategies that can qualitatively improve the remote nursing home research experience.